TOURNEY: Rubiks Rampage

[haWD96lz]

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504744/

Duck and cover 3 attacking me.

 

[sannheten]

Europe Massive won by Sannheten

 

[markattax]

Australia: markattax vs haWD96lz

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504885/

 

[clarkenfeld]

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504742/

clarkenfeld attacks and defeats Mexico (TheBob)

 

[EasyToKill]

1984 won by EasyToKill

 

[palmono]

Conflict Africa won by Palmono: https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504555/

 

[periwinkle]

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504730/

USA won by Periwinkle

 

[Cardinalsrule]

Cardinalsrule successfully defends Barbarossa
https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504729/

 

[LotsOFFLuck]

Lotsoffluck defends the Forgotten Kingdom
https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504722/

 

[haWD96lz]

hawd96lz captures australia from markattax

 

[trailblazer]

Middle East was captured by trailblazer
https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504554/

 

[Hortik]

Hortik conquers Philippines.

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504745/

 

[Cardinalsrule]

Cardinalsrule wins the game for Balkans
https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504668/

 

[brianstheman]

ROUND ONE - Assault Phase

Start/join the games listed below!
Defenders set up their game and invite the others. (then either post the link here or inbox it to me)
Settings -> Singles : Sequential : Escalate : One : Path : Chance : 24hr (casual) : Password
3 player games are Assassin. All other games are Standard.

If data shows the new 1v1 rules effectively mitigate first turn advantage, would it make sense to implement those in subsequent rounds?

 

[Cardinalsrule]

If data shows the new 1v1 rules effectively mitigate first turn advantage, would it make sense to implement those in subsequent rounds?

I'm adamantly opposed to changing the rules in the middle of a game.

 

[markattax]

Duck & Cover: haWD96lz vs Zorbmonkey vs markattax vs BadElmer (4 players)
https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504744/

captured by markattax

 

[Zorbmonkey]

ROUND ONE - Assault Phase

Start/join the games listed below!
Defenders set up their game and invite the others. (then either post the link here or inbox it to me)
Settings -> Singles : Sequential : Escalate : One : Path : Chance : 24hr (casual) : Password
3 player games are Assassin. All other games are Standard.

If data shows the new 1v1 rules effectively mitigate first turn advantage, would it make sense to implement those in subsequent rounds?

I will allow defenders to choose which 1v1 rules they want.

 

[Zorbmonkey]

I'm adamantly opposed to changing the rules in the middle of a game.

The alternate 1v1 rules don't change the official settings of the games, thus it doesn't conflict with any rules mentioned in the Rubiks Rampage description.
Defenders can choose which version of 1v1 they want to play, it won't be forced.

 

[Cardinalsrule]

The alternate 1v1 rules don't change the official settings of the games, thus it doesn't conflict with any rules mentioned in the Rubiks Rampage description.
Defenders can choose which version of 1v1 they want to play, it won't be forced.

Well, I'm NOT going to join any games with changed rules. If that's a problem for you, you can kick me out of the tourney.

 

[d-flat]

North America has been conquered by d-flat against palmono, LotsOFFLuck and KowBoy

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/504570/