• Scoreboard and Points Live. Read about it HERE

    current issues

    1 - NEW PLAYERS - Players who created an account on or after Oct 15 2023 are not able to log into the forum
    2 - AWOL - We do not have an AWOL button under the ACTIVE tab yet. Please check each game to see if you are AWOL.

    Thanks.

  • Welcome to Major Command's RISK Game forum.

    If you are a registered player, please log in:

    LOG IN

    If you are new to Major Command and would like to
    play our RISK game online. Then please sign up here:

    SIGN UP

Balkans - or - The Balkan Peninsula

Cardinalsrule

Administrator
Staff member
CentCom
Awesome Player
Whiner & CryBaby
Fixed Force Club
AADOMM
Assassins Guild
Enemies of Diplomacy
Generals
Knights of MC Realm
M.C. Clan Council
M.C. Play Testers
The Borg
The Embassy
T.O's.
Kickstarter
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
4,787
well, that seems like a big jump from +1 to +4. Hmmm. I think that's too big a bonus for holding 4 'terts', even if they all have attack points.
 

Shepherd

Studio Production Manager
CentCom
O.G.
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
3,962
well, that seems like a big jump from +1 to +4. Hmmm. I think that's too big a bonus for holding 4 'terts', even if they all have attack points.
agreed, but part of why it works on the Middle East map is that none of the regions border each other and, thus, provide no support to each other. It would be the same here.
 

patsfan44

Well-known member
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
491
A flat 4 bonus or 3 would be good. IMO
 

smi

Well-known member
Awesome Player
Kickstarter
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
156
with the currect tech we can make it work this way :
Give + 1 if you own Ionian , Aegean and Black Sea ( like a normal command )
Give + 2 if you own Ionian , Aegean , Black Sea and Adriatic . ( or maybe just +1 )

So... if you hold all 4 you get + 3 total . ( or +2 total )

Also you are kinda forced to begin from the south and east seas to get the +1 first then if you manage to secure adriatic you get a larger bonus .

Since they are all over the map it could get tricky to hold all the seas . What you guys think ?
 

Cardinalsrule

Administrator
Staff member
CentCom
Awesome Player
Whiner & CryBaby
Fixed Force Club
AADOMM
Assassins Guild
Enemies of Diplomacy
Generals
Knights of MC Realm
M.C. Clan Council
M.C. Play Testers
The Borg
The Embassy
T.O's.
Kickstarter
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
4,787
that could work, but it favors one side of the map over the other. I guess my solution would be to just give +4 for holding all 4.
 

Shepherd

Studio Production Manager
CentCom
O.G.
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
3,962
I'm fine with making it +4 for holding all four, but I want folks to have the option of trying to think out of the box here. Perhaps we want to add more port connections so they aren't so easy to hold... right now you can hold three of them and only have to worry about defending against four land regions. No doubt there's a port along the Black Sea that could add an attack route there. Also, the way we've got the Ionian connected to Central Greece makes for nice flow, but I believe that the major port serving the west is Patras, which is on the Peloponnese - moving the port down there would make Greece a bit harder to hold, but would make the Peloponnese much more important strategically.
 

patsfan44

Well-known member
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
491
I would be for that Shep. Peloponnese was the only territory that was a dead end.
 

aym

Active member
Awesome Player
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
39
I agree with Shepherd about moving the Ionian Sea port to Patras and adding a Black Sea port. You could add a port in Varna from the Black Sea, that's realistic as it's the largest city and seaport on the Bulgarian coast. Also, for the Aegean Sea, I think another port in Greek Macedonia would work as Thessaloniki is one of the busiest ports in Greece and the area in general. It would also serve to create a link from the sea to the middle of the map through Macedonia.
 

Cardinalsrule

Administrator
Staff member
CentCom
Awesome Player
Whiner & CryBaby
Fixed Force Club
AADOMM
Assassins Guild
Enemies of Diplomacy
Generals
Knights of MC Realm
M.C. Clan Council
M.C. Play Testers
The Borg
The Embassy
T.O's.
Kickstarter
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
4,787
Perhaps we want to add more port connections so they aren't so easy to hold... right now you can hold three of them and only have to worry about defending against four land regions.

true, but you have to defend against 4 regions to get a +1. That's not exactly a great deal there..... I don't really agree with adding a lot of attack routes.

Defending against 5 to get a +4 IS a pretty good deal, though.
 
Last edited:

Shepherd

Studio Production Manager
CentCom
O.G.
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
3,962
What I was getting at (but failed to actually say) is that there's one sea lane combo that only has four borders, while other combinations have more. Right now:
Ionian, Aegean, and Black Seas; three regions with four borders for a +1.
Adriatic, Ionian, and Aegean: three regions with five borders foe +1.
Adriatic, Aegean, and Black: three regions with six borders for a +1.
Adriatic, Ionian, and Black: three regions with six borders for a +1.

The common sea in the three hardest to hold combinations is Adriatic, because it obviously has one more port than the others, and two of those ports are not shared with any other Sea. Adriatic is the least advantageous sea to hold.

The second least advantageous sea is the Black Sea, since Artsyz doesn't isn't shared with another sea and can't serve as a jumping off point to another sea (as Istanbul and Central Greece do).

So if we're going to make any sea region/s more difficult to hold it should be Aegean and/or Ionian. Aym's idea of adding Thesaloniki sounds like a decent one, and patsfan44 points out that right now Peloponnese is a dead end.
 

Cardinalsrule

Administrator
Staff member
CentCom
Awesome Player
Whiner & CryBaby
Fixed Force Club
AADOMM
Assassins Guild
Enemies of Diplomacy
Generals
Knights of MC Realm
M.C. Clan Council
M.C. Play Testers
The Borg
The Embassy
T.O's.
Kickstarter
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
4,787
I still think its already too hard to hold (with any of the combinations) for a +1, why make it harder?

If that was a command with 3 terts and 4 borders, it'd be more than a +1, right?
 

Shepherd

Studio Production Manager
CentCom
O.G.
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
3,962
crap, here's a mind-bender...

If we removed the port in Split, and moved the Ionian port from Central Greece to Peloponnese, every combination of three would have exactly five borders regions to defend against. It doesn't add any defense points if you're holding all four (nor does it subtract any: there's six either way), but I think it makes it trickier to hold since you don't have this simple chain of land, sea, land, sea, land, sea, land, sea, land. ??
 

Shepherd

Studio Production Manager
CentCom
O.G.
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
3,962
I still think its already too hard to hold (with any of the combinations) for a +1, why make it harder?
Think of it this way:
it's a four region, +4 command, that continues to give you a partial bonus even if you lose one region. Doesn't sound so bad, does it?

Anyway, I'm check my latest solution (which you fast-posted!)
 

Cardinalsrule

Administrator
Staff member
CentCom
Awesome Player
Whiner & CryBaby
Fixed Force Club
AADOMM
Assassins Guild
Enemies of Diplomacy
Generals
Knights of MC Realm
M.C. Clan Council
M.C. Play Testers
The Borg
The Embassy
T.O's.
Kickstarter
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
4,787
Think of it this way:
it's a four region, +4 command, that continues to give you a partial bonus even if you lose one region. Doesn't sound so bad, does it?

Anyway, I'm check my latest solution (which you fast-posted!)

No, that doesn't sound bad, but still has enough 'borders' - doesn't need more.
 

patsfan44

Well-known member
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
491
I find the port in split to clutter the ports in the west. So I would be in favor of its removal. Also I believe a Pelponnesse port on the west coast would be a good idea.
 

Sebrim

Well-known member
Moderator
Awesome Player
Fixed Force Club
Knights of MC Realm
M.C. Play Testers
The Borg
The Wiki Bar
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
1,513
+1 Shep's idea sounds good!
 

aym

Active member
Awesome Player
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
39
How about:

Adriatic - Rijeka, Durres
Ionian - Durres, Peloponnese
Aegean - Central Greece, Greek Macedonia, Istanbul
Black Sea - Istanbul, Artsyz

All ships can be held in a path with 7 territories. Or protect against 6 land regions.
 

Shepherd

Studio Production Manager
CentCom
O.G.
Awesome Player
AADOMM
M.C. Play Testers
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
3,962
one thing I've noticed in the 3p practice game some of us are in is that it's really easy to sweep through the shipping lanes since Central Greece connects to both Ionian and Aegean... it makes sense that somebody would need to travel over land to get from port to port, so the Peloponnese addition is big in my opinion.
 
Top