- Joined
- Jul 25, 2010
- Messages
- 1,276
On the topic of scoreboards and less on total score. Going off of th-child's idea and chilly's. I like them.
But what about an all time Muy Head Honcho scoreboard. I am of the belief you can't be crowned King of majcom unless you play all game variants and maps. Fixed rate, Assassin, team play, 1v1, multiplayer singles, etc. Can you be a champion without playing fixed force? Or never stepped foot into a team game? Or never took a win on assassins?
So pick the smaller scoreboards, once built out. And choose a set of 5 or so boards that will make up the best player. You would have to have played 20 games with some sort of matrix on playing all levels of players. The last 20 games payed on any scoreboard make up a winning %. Average out the winning % of all boards to determine who is boss.
I'd go with setting up say 7 scoreboards (just picked that out of thin air). Then the top position on each scoreboard gets 100 points, second place gets 99 points, and so on. Then the master scoreboard would be a sum of points you earned on each one. I'd probably double weight 1v1, 2v2 and small FFA (6 or less?). If you were on a team scoreboard more than once (ie. with multiple teammates) you only get credit for the top place.
I might even say go with 10 scoreboards (3 double weighted - so 13 * 100 total pts), but only pick the top 10 scoreboard points. So if you really don't like fixed, or assassin or crusades, you still have a chance to get on the board. Also, this allows people who don't have gold a chance on the master board (since they can't do fixed or crusades). Of course if your lowest was one of the double weighted boards you would only get to drop that and one of the single weighted.
This would put the max score at 1000, but scores above 600-700 would probably be pretty awesome.
Again, just continuing to think out loud.