- Joined
- Feb 8, 2019
- Messages
- 18
Hi, so I have been wondering about this strategic question:
EDIT: The question applies to a flat rate game.
When you and another player are both the strongest (in terms of troops and troops due) on the map (similar troop/troops due counts, maybe they're a little bit stronger than you still), is it best to attack them, or is it wiser to attack smaller enemies to up your troops due?
But, when choosing to attack smaller enemies I might be upping my troops due but depending how many troops I had to kill in my expansion I'll reduce my troop count considerably long and fall behind the other strong player, and it will take dozens of rounds for the troops due gained to compensate the initial troop loss.
If you attack the other strong player instead, making them weaker, you'll make yourself the main target of the game.
So what's the best strategy in such a situation?
Cheers,
Totoro
EDIT: The question applies to a flat rate game.
When you and another player are both the strongest (in terms of troops and troops due) on the map (similar troop/troops due counts, maybe they're a little bit stronger than you still), is it best to attack them, or is it wiser to attack smaller enemies to up your troops due?
But, when choosing to attack smaller enemies I might be upping my troops due but depending how many troops I had to kill in my expansion I'll reduce my troop count considerably long and fall behind the other strong player, and it will take dozens of rounds for the troops due gained to compensate the initial troop loss.
If you attack the other strong player instead, making them weaker, you'll make yourself the main target of the game.
So what's the best strategy in such a situation?
Cheers,
Totoro