24 man game trapped in a perpetual 3way tie. Help!

[Dunamai]

We are in a never ending battle. Can MajCom resolve a 3way tie if party's agree?

 

[Cardinalsrule]

Well, a game number or link would help, but the short answer is no, you 3 will have to decide how to end it. Try the -1 rule.

 

[ndrm31]

https://www.majorcommand.com/games/330068/ actually a side game is another option, who win the sidegame takes all

 

[Bluebonnet]

Or just attack. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. A stalemate is by choice.

 

[Dunamai]

Thanks for the input. The link is https://www.majorcommand.com/games/330068/
I did attempt and attacked both... breaking into each, but neither would follow. LOL. So, I in effect weakened myself, but strong enough that if they attack me to take out, it is an automatic win for the other. Neither willing to go for it, but all willing to settle for a tie.

I had heard there is a way to make that happen. A tie that is. But if not, we will march on.
Thanks

 

[Dunamai]

Good idea. Rematch, winner take all. I will suggest it. Thanks.

 

[ndrm31]

yep a sidegame, escalate, assassin will be beter to avoid another tie

 

[BadElmer]

A stalemate is by choice.

In chance games, this is always true.

 

[ndrm31]

Or just attack. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. A stalemate is by choice.

I hate the minus-1 rule. Whoever invented it should be tied down and beat. (quote from a gamechat a few days ago) *not mine

 

[Bluebonnet]

I hate the minus-1 rule. Whoever invented it should be tied down and beat. (quote from a gamechat a few days ago) *not mine

I've only played a couple minus 1. Never cared for it.

I attack and get things moving. If i get taken out, who cares? It is only points. Better than a boring game of stacking.